Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
LibQUAL+ SURVEY OVERVIEW
- What is the LibQUAL+
survey?
- What does the survey
measure?
- How will this survey
benefit the Concordia University community?
- Are responses
confidential?
- What survey instrument is
being used?
- Do all libraries use the
same questions?
- What other libraries are
participating in LibQUAL?
- How can I get more
information about LibQUAL+?
RESULTS
- What will be done with the
survey results?
- What information is shared
with other institutions?
- What do the survey results
look like?
LibQUAL+ SURVEY OVERVIEW
- What
is the LibQUAL+ survey?
Service quality has always been the focus of libraries; LibQUAL+ is
intended to provide a measure of the value of library service quality
across multiple academic and research libraries. The current LibQUAL+
instrument measures library users' perceptions of their libraries'
service quality and identifies gaps between minimal, desired and
perceived levels of service.
Concordia University Libraries will use LibQUAL+ to solicit, track,
understand, and act upon users' opinions of service quality. LibQUAL+
is offered to the library community by the Association of Research
Libraries (ARL). The program's centerpiece is a rigorously tested
Web-based survey bundled with training that helps libraries assess and
improve library services, change organizational culture, and market the
library. The growing community of participants and its extensive
dataset are rich resources for improving library services.
- What
does the survey measure?
The instrument addresses three service quality dimensions that have
been found to be valid in previous assessments of library services:
Affect of Service, Library as Place, Information Control. Each question
has three parts that ask respondents to indicate (1) the minimum
service level they will accept, (2) the desired service level they
expect, and (3) the perceived level of service currently provided. This
design will permit analysis of gaps between expectations, perception,
and minimum acceptance level of service. In addition, it will reveal
which services are vital to our users, with the highest scores for
desired level.
- How
will this survey benefit the Concordia University community?
As individual libraries receive information about areas needing
improvement, this project will allow libraries to compare their service
quality with other peer institutions, to develop benchmarks, and to
surface best practices across institutions. By using the LibQUAL+
instrument and initiating action based on the results of this survey,
Concordia University Libraries can be more responsive to users' needs
and provide services that are better aligned to users'
expectations.To learn more about some initiatives implemented
as a result of previous survey feedback, visit our Response to your Feedback
page
- Are
responses confidential?
Yes. The LibQUAL+ approach to confidentiality is guided by the ethical
standards of the American Psychological Association (see http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html,
section 4). Although some information is captured from respondents,
such as network and email addresses, privacy is protected in two ways.
First, only very indirect information is captured which would be
difficult to trace back to an individual. Second, everything possible
is done to separate personal information from survey responses. Email
addresses are not saved with the responses, and once they are saved
there is no way to link an individual's responses to their email
address.
- What
survey instrument is being used?
The LibQUAL+ survey evolved from a conceptual model based on the
SERVQUAL instrument, a popular tool for assessing service quality in
the private sector grounded in the "Gap Theory of Service Quality". It
was developed by Leonard L. Berry (Distinguished Professor, Texas
A&M University), A. Parasuraman, and Valarie A. Zeithaml. The
Texas A&M University Libraries and other libraries used
modified SERVQUAL instruments for several years; those applications
revealed the need for a newly adapted tool that would serve the
particular requirements of libraries. From 1999, ARL, representing the
largest research libraries in North America, partnered with Texas
A&M University Libraries to develop, test, and refine LibQUAL+.
This effort was supported in part by a three-year grant from the U.S.
Department of Education's Fund for the Improvement of Post-Secondary
Education (FIPSE).
This year, Concordia University Libraries have decided to opt for the
new LibQual Lite version of the survey. By using this shorter form, we
ensure that no respondent will have to answer more than 19 questions
(not counting demographic items) compared with 34 questions for the
full LibQual survey that was done in the past. The average time to
complete
LibQual Lite is only 6 minutes. For more information on the instrument,
please see
"from LibQual to LibQual+ Lite".
The questionnaire is straightforward and involves no deception or
coercion. Potential respondents may elect not to proceed with the
survey after reading the guarantees of confidentiality and privacy.
- Do
all libraries use the same questions?
All libraries participating in the 2010 LibQUAL+ survey use the
same 33 core questions and demographic questions. In addition, each
Library may select 5 questions from a list of 122 optional questions.
Concordia University Libraries has opted to select the same five
optional questions that were decided upon by the Canadian Association
of Research Libraries (CARL), so that we may compare our results
with those of other Canadian academic institutions.
- What
other libraries are participating in LibQUAL?
For a complete list (coming soon), see http://www.libqual.org/about/about_survey/participants.
CARL also has a web site
on the 2010
Canada wide LibQUAL+ initiative.
- How
can I get more information about LibQUAL+?
For more information, see the LibQUAL+(TM) homepage at http://www.libqual.org/home.
To e-mail the national headquarters for LibQUAL+, contact the
Association for Research Libraries at LibQUAL@arl.org.
RESULTS
- What
will be done with the survey results?
Survey data are transmitted directly from the LibQUAL+ server to a
database. The data are then analyzed and reports are generated for
individual libraries that provide information on how users perceive the
quality of their service. Participating institutions will have access
to summary results for each institution, allowing for comparisons among
peer institutions and all participating academic institutions. This
will aid in developing benchmarks and understanding best practices
across institutions, and will help Concordia University Libraries to
align services with user expectations.
To learn more about initiatives taken by the Libraries in response to
feedback gathered in previous LibQual surveys,
see our Response to your Feedback
page.
- What
information is shared with other institutions?
Summary statistics only are shared with other institutions. The survey
summary results will be made available to participants via the World
Wide Web on a password-protected Web site. Users' comments (from the
comments section) will be made available only to the users' institution.
- What
do the survey results look like?
Survey results include aggregate summaries, demographics by
library, item summaries, dimension summaries, and dimensions measured
for survey implementation.
page last updated on: Friday 1 April 2011